Weobley
Herefordshire
History to the 15th century
An error on this page has just been corrected 3/4/08 -
the third son of Walter de Lacy, who became Abbot of
Gloucester in 1130, was Walter, not Peter, de Lacy |
 |
William
fitz Osbern become Earl of Hereford
after the Conquest, and Weobley passed
into his hands at some time thereafter.
It was given in turn to Walter de
Lacy, a member of fitz Osbern’s
household, who held it of the earl.
Fitz Osbern died in 1072 and in 1075
his heir, Roger of Breteuil, forfeited
his lands for revolt and Walter became
a tenant-in-chief of the crown.
|
|
Walter’s
other holdings included a swathe of
land in the south-west of Herefordshire
which was Welsh at the time of the
Conquest. This area was known
as Ewyas Lacy and probably had its
main stronghold at Pont Hendre Castle,
near
Longtown. Also in this area
is the village of Walterstone, which
may have been named after him.
Walter died in 1085, falling from
St
Peter’s Church in Hereford,
during its construction, and his lands
passed to his son, Roger de Lacy,
who is recorded as holding Weobley
in Domesday. Roger held 14 demesne
and 50 tenants’ manors in Herefordshire
and had large holdings elsewhere.
Weobley was to pass down in a direct
line of descent for centuries and
the lord of the manor was to have
considerable influence on its subsequent
history. |
|
The
Domesday manor of Weobley possessed
3 ploughs in lordship. There
were 10 villeins, a priest, a reeve,
a smith and 5 bordars with 9½ ploughs.
There were 11 serfs, woodland measuring
½ league by 4 furlongs, and a park.
Land newly brought into cultivation,
or assarting, had provided
land for one plough. One of
the villeins belonged to the church
of St Peter in Hereford, by the gift
of Walter de Lacy. (One of Edwi’s
manors given to Walter was Priors
Frome, which Walter, in turn, gave
to his new church of St Peter in Hereford.
|
 |
|
Although
assarting is assumed to occur over
many parts of England, Domesday only
specifies it in Herefordshire, the
other entries being for Fernhill,
Much Marcle and Leominster
(Darby,
1976, p189). In general,
by the 11th century England
was one of the least wooded countries
of Europe, and Domesday appears to
indicate that Herefordshire was even
less wooded than most of the rest
of the country with woodland occupying
perhaps around 8% of the land (Rackham,
1980, p 126). By the 1840s
the percentage of woodland in Weobley
was less than 10%.
(See map on page 54
of A D M Phillip’s paper on
land use in the Herefordshire Tithe
Survey in the Transactions of
the Woolhope Naturalists' Field Club,
1979.)
|
|
Specific
mention of parks is also comparatively
rare in Domesday, and only 35 are
recorded. Emparking was a recent
introduction, the earliest recorded
park being at Ongar in Essex which
was certainly pre-Conquest.
Parks were large enclosures used to
contain deer for the table and were
not essentially associated with hunting,
which took place in unenclosed areas.
The deer would have been the native
red and roe deer. Later centuries
would see a large growth in the number
of parks and the introduction of the
fallow deer (Rackham,
1990, p152).
In 1088 Roger de Lacy was banished
after his father’s old ally
Bishop Wulfstan, stopped him, in turn,
from crossing the Severn, and his
brother Hugh took over his estates.
The de Lacys were responsible for
the construction of castles at Weobley
and Ludlow. Both castles were
associated with early boroughs.
Ludlow appears to be a new plantation
but Weobley was already a settlement
and the street plans of the two boroughs
illustrate the difference (Noble,
1964, p65).
The
English surname Webley derives from
the settlement and a Thomas de Webbele
recorded in 1308 (Shrewsbury
mss ). Weobley was the most
common of the Herefordshire place-name
surnames in the London telephone directory
for the year 2000 and is widely distributed.
In 1337 Richard de Webbelye was the
city of Hereford’s mace-bearer
(Salt,
1953, p 6) and in the 15th
century a Walter
and a Thomas Webbely witnessed deeds
from Eastnor, in the East of Herefordshire.
The castle at Weobley was probably
built by either Roger or Hugh de Lacy
in the late 11th century.
The castle was garrisoned on behalf
of the Empress Matilda against Stephen
in 1139 and was re-taken by Stephen
himself the following year.
|
|
Weobley
was the caput of the de Lacy
lands, which included the castles
and boroughs at Ludlow and Ewyas Lacy
(Longtown),
held for the service
of 7½ knights. Presumably
originally earthen, the castle seems
to have been rebuilt in stone by the
third Walter de Lacy in the early
13th century (Hillaby,
1985). In 1327 the castle
was stated to be ‘of
no value being in ruins’
and in 1328 referred to as ‘a
ruinous castle of no value’
but this seems to have been a misrepresentation
of its condition, for in 1331 it was
stated that the castle had been undervalued.
In 1332 the value was ‘£41
16d by the first extent and £81 10s
8½d by the second extent’.
In 1357 John Ailmond was pardoned
for the offence of breaking out of
his prison in ‘the
castle of Webbeleye’,
providing that he stood trial for
the felony for which he was detained
in the first place. In 1483, Weobley
was the centre of the rebellion of
Henry, Duke of Buckingham against
Richard III. Buckingham was executed
in Salisbury and his wife captured
in Weobley. John Leland, writing
in the 1530s, says of Weobley ‘where
is a goodly castell, but somewhat
in decay’.
William
fitz Osbern, like other Norman lords,
had acquired the technique of borough
founding in Normandy where William
the Conqueror himself had employed
it at Caen. Fitz Osbern, having
been given the castle of Breteuil-sur-Iton
in around 1050, constructed a
boorg there, as he had previously
at nearby Cormeilles (Hillaby,
1983).
If they founded boroughs at Ewyas
Lacy and Weobley, the de Lacys followed
the pattern set by their old patron,
and it is possible that the by-laws
of these boroughs, as were Hereford’s,
were based on the customs of Breteuil,
a code which was to become widespread
among the new boroughs of the Marches,
Wales and Ireland. The de Lacy
borough at Ludlow has been shown to
have been privileged with these customs
(Noble,
1964). These laws were designed
to encourage immigration from Normandy
to provide soldiers and develop trade
in the newly acquired lands.
Weobley,
situated at a point equidistant from
Hereford and Leominster, appears to
have been a successful borough.
It sent its own Jury to the Assize
of 1255. At the end of the 13th
century Edward I empowered the Herefordshire
boroughs of Weobley, Bromyard, Ledbury
and Ross to return two members of
parliament each. Weobley returned
Adam Sagoun and John Compaygnoun as
its members in 1295 and two members
to the parliaments of 1298, September
and October of 1302 and to the parliament
of 1305. It returned Richard
Yagon alone in 1306 (Williams,
1896, pp 155,156). At this
time, Weobley, Bromyard,
Ledbury and Ross had the privilege
of representation withdrawn.
This was at their own request, the
two shillings per day payment to members
being, they claimed, beyond their
means (Noble,
1964, p69). Hereford and
Leominster were then the only two
Herefordshire boroughs represented
until Weobley regained parliamentary
borough status again in 1628.
Whatever
problems Weobley may have experienced
in paying its parliamentary burgesses
(and much larger towns would experience
the same problems in succeeding centuries)
documentary evidence suggests that
Weobley was at least reasonably prosperous.
It was situated near the rich sheep
farming area centred on Leominster,
which produced the wool known as ‘Lemster
Ore’. The value of
this wool is indicated by a 1454 act
of parliament which fixed the price
of ‘Herefordshire woll
in Lemyst’ at £13
per bag in comparison with £8 6s 8d
per bag for Cotswold wool (Roskell,
1992, p437).
|
 |
Weobley
in 1831 by John Hilden |
|
In
1315 a grant was made to ‘the
bailiffs and good men of the town
of Webbeleye of pavage for three years
upon all wares for sale brought into
their town’.
When this was expired, a new grant
was made in 1319, specifically at
the instance of Queen Isabella, this
time for 5 years. Medieval
Weobley possessed a
market, a water-mill and by 1327,
a wind-mill. Apart from
milling, the normal range of medieval
trades were represented in the borough;
in 1316 the local smith, Miles Smith
(fabri), had
a messuage near the castle and
in 1360 a Weobley tanner, John Geffes,
was murdered
in Worcestershire. Deeds
mention a tailor
in 1363, and a baker and a
muleward
in 1370. A Jewish
community was present in the late
13th century (Salt,
1953, p 19).
The
Subsidy of the Ninth and the Fifteenth
records only three Herefordshire boroughs
where burgesses paid the higher ninth
part in 1341. Hereford has 87
names, Leominster 32 and Weobley 17
(Reeves,
1972, p45).
In the poll tax for the year 1377,
every person not a genuine pauper,
of 14 years or over was liable to
pay one groat (four old pence).
Unfortunately we do not have the Weobley
figures for 1377, but the 1379 tax
was on
all males and all unmarried females
of 16 years or over. In
this latter year, 152 persons were
recorded as having paid the poll tax
in Weobley (Fenwick,
1998). Among the occupations
listed are carpenters, shoemakers,
piscator,
a smith, a tanner, a butcher, a petimarch
and a tegulat. The last
term refers to someone who worked
with bricks or tiles and implies that
Weobley had buildings which required
this skill, a petimarch is
a small merchant or trader.
John
Hayes was a butcher in Weobley
in 1428 and in 1455 the tanner John
Garston was pardoned of outlawry.
There are specific references to shops
in 1292 (Salt,
1953, p 19), 1294 (ibid.
p 12) and in 1392, when a licence
for alienation in mortmain for property
including three shops was granted.
In
1402 the then lord of the manor, Sir
Walter Devereux, was killed at the
battle of Bryn Glās. In this
action a large force of English under
Edmund Mortimer, consisting mainly
of the Herefordshire levy, were defeated
by a Welsh army led by Owain Glyn
Dŵr. It took place on a
hill just south of Pilleth, a village
to the south of Knighton and just
to the west of Offa’s Dyke.
The defeat caused consternation at
Henry IV’s court and steps were
quickly taken to limit the damage
by improving defences at Clifford,
Brecon and elsewhere (Davies,
R R, 1995, p107). Men from
Weobley would certainly have been
among the dead, and the mutilation
of corpses by the Welsh added horror
to the English accounts of the action.
Bryn Glās is thirteen miles from Weobley,
and the alarm in the borough would
have been considerable.
|
|
|
|
The
de Lacys were notable benefactors
of the church. Walter could
have been said to have given his life
to it, albeit accidentally (see above).
Hugh de Lacy, who was possibly buried
in the Church, had given the living
of Weobley Church to Llanthony Priory.
Hugh’s elder brother, Roger, had been
banished (see above), but another
brother, Walter, entered Gloucester
Abbey as a boy and rose to become
Abbot in 1130 (Wightman,
1966, p169). Giraldus Cambrensis recounts
the story of one William, a kinsman
and former soldier of Hugh, who after
some sort of religious experience
had taken to an eremitic life in an
isolated spot in Wales. It was
he who was allegedly the inspiration
of Hugh to assist in the foundation
of the priory of Llanthony in 1108.
The priory, the first house of Augustinian
Canons to be built in Wales, was later
endowed with the tithes of Weobley
and the patronage of the church passed
to the prior and convent (Phillott,
1871, p350). Llanthony was
all but abandoned following the Welsh
rebellion of 1135 and a new house,
Llanthony Secunda, was built outside
Gloucester and its church consecrated
in 1137. The Lacys maintained
their interest in the first church
and at the end of the 12th
century Hugh de Lacy II made grants
of lands and churches from his new
possessions in Meath specifically
to the Welsh house. This led
to a formal split in 1205, followed
by a lengthy dispute over joint property
resulting in a settlement in 1213.
The two houses were re-merged in 1481
with Llanthony Prima being made a
cell of Secunda. The Weobley
tithes and patronage would probably
have followed the legal position,
only passing to the Gloucester house
in 1481.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Weobley
in 1891 |
|
View
the web-site of the
Weobley and district Local History
Society
Archaeological sites in Weobley can
be viewed at
Historic Herefordshire On Line.
|
|
|
Back
to Top
series -
Herefordshire Archaeology and History, Weobley |
|
|